Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jo Lein's avatar

Wow—these findings hit hard and definitely push us to reconsider how we approach leadership. The idea that leaders who go "above and beyond" are seeing less than half the reciprocation they expect challenges one of the core beliefs many of us hold: that investing deeply in people always yields a positive return. This "reciprocity myth" suggests that what we think is generosity might sometimes be fostering dependence, or worse, entitlement.

In my experience as a coach and leader, I’ve seen how critical it is to pair support with accountability. True development isn’t just about being there for people—it’s about creating a balanced environment where team members grow with clear expectations and ownership of their contributions. Otherwise, “support” can end up feeling more like rescue or enablement, creating exactly the dynamics we hope to avoid.

What are some ways you've seen leaders strike that balance between supporting and empowering? And what’s your take on how much “above and beyond” should actually be sustainable for leaders?

Expand full comment
Orvyl Tumaneng's avatar

This just proves that we need to challenge conventional wisdom with evidence-based analysis. There are beliefs and practices applied in the workplace that are expected to yield great results and happier experiences but produce what exactly the company is avoiding. Being a manager in a tech company, almost all of the "pretty theory" I saw and believed.

These are hard truths to swallow BUT a great starting point towards improving a workplace in alignment with what the world is now. #PushTheStatusQuo

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts